The Risks And Benefits Of Lawsuit Funding

Lawsuit funding is more popular today than ever as the expense of filing a lawsuit increases. Unfortunately, many individuals do not have adequate resources to pursue their lawsuit. For the few who are aware it exists, finding the necessary funding assistance even when that may be funding a lawsuit through a loan or cash advance can be a daunting process. The good news is that many of the options available to those considering settlement advances are viable options. Nevertheless, you must weigh the good with the bad to find the right solution for your needs.

Pre-Settlement Funding Solutions

One important consideration is that of pre-settlement funding; which is a cash advance that can provide you with the funds you need to fund your lawsuit with little risk. You can secure these funds through a matter of presenting your case to attorneys. The benefit to this type of lawsuit funding is that you are only liable to pay the borrowed funds back through the settlement that you receive through your case going your way. Should you not win your lawsuit, you don’t have to repay these funds. This reduces your risks of losing money considerably, giving you more security to fight your case. If your settlement isn’t large enough to cover the costs of repayment, you again are not liable to paying these funds back. It’s the loss of the lender.

The disadvantages of pre-settlement funding are simple. The cost of repaying through your settlement can be high, especially when a recurring fee is used as the method of calculating what you owe. There is competition amongst lawsuit advance firms which can help to lower your costs, though. In addition, you may not be able to secure this type of funding if your lawsuit isn’t firmly founded. Lenders generally only offer these cash advances when you are able to win your settlement with a lesser risk.

Other Lending Options Considered

Pre-settlement funding is probably the best method of lawsuit funding available today, but its not the only thing out there. You may be able to secure a loan through other means, such as a personal loan. These are often difficult to get with stringent income requirements. In addition, these funds are due in full no matter what happens in your case. Should you use your home as collateral to secure these funds, you could potentially lose your home if you stop making payments on them. That’s definitely not the best route to take. Other options, like credit cards, are available too, with many of the same risks.

Securing the right method of lawsuit funding is something you should consider. You need funds to get your case into the court system. If you don’t invest the money into it, you may not get what you should get out of a settlement. Indeed, using pre-settlement funding is a good option for many, especially those that know they can win their case.

Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Advances Online has helped many people get an advance on their settlement to pay living expenses, medical bills, and get back on track - before settlement of their lawsuit.

Is a Structured Settlement Right for you?

If you had the misfortune of being involved in an accident of some type, a
Structured Settlement may be in your best interest. A structured settlement
can help you gain the financial security and protection for you and your family
over the years to come. The simple truth is, you don't know what kind of problems
can develop further down the road from the results of your injuries. This could
put you in a hard position if you weren't prepared.


There are several things to think about when it comes to structured settlements.
The first is the fact that you'll be compensated by installment payments over
the course of time, rather than receiving a large lump sum. This can be very
important in that, if you were to receive one large lump sum and didn't manage
your money wisely, you could put yourself into financial instability. If you develop
problems down the road from your prior injuries, it could be the beginning

of a finacial downward spiral. This could also put massive strain on your family and
possible do more harm than the injury itself.


Another thing to keep in mind is your structured settlement payments are 100%
tax-free. This could be another reason to consider this option.


However, the best option to choose will be different for everyone because of
each individual's unique situation. You see, it's very possible that the best
option for someone else, could be one large lump sum up front. This is actually
quite often the case, but you need to be very careful on how you handle the
sale of you structured settlement.


There are many companies out there that will buy your structured settlement and
pay you cash now, but you really need to do some exploring and find out
what's best for you in selling your structured settlement.


Choosing the right specialty finance company to work with is an important
decision, and many people do not know where to turn for advice. There
are great firms that are designed to help you get the most money for your structured
settlements and annuity payments. Many of these firms make this process very
easy for you by matching you with the best possible financial institution to
handle your settlement, and letting you decide how to proceed, putting the control
where it should be, in your hands.

Merck reaches broad Vioxx settlement

Merck & Co. said Friday it will pay $4.85 billion to end thousands of lawsuits over its painkiller Vioxx in what is believed to be the largest drug settlement ever.



Merck faced personal injury lawsuits representing 47,000 plaintiffs, and about 265 potential class action cases, filed by people or family members who claimed the drug proved fatal or injured its users. The agreement covers cases filed in both federal and state courts.

Negotiating teams met more than 50 times in eight states and spoke hundreds of times over the telephone to hammer out the deal, according to attorneys.

"I'm very happy with it," Chris Seeger, one of the six plaintiff lawyers who helped negotiate the settlement, said Friday. "It's a tremendous way to resolve this litigation."

Merck pulled Vioxx from the market Sept. 30, 2004 after its researchers determined the then-blockbuster painkiller doubled risk of heart attacks and strokes.

To qualify for a settlement, plaintiffs must have filed claims by Thursday and meet several criteria, including medical proof that they suffered a heart attack or stroke, that they received at least 30 Vioxx pills and that they received enough pills to support a presumption that they were ingested within two weeks before injury.

That is a big concession by Merck, which has long claimed that Vioxx caused harm only after 18 months of use.

Those claims were dismissed by independent scientists and plaintiffs lawyers.

Merck stressed that the agreement is not a class action settlement and that it is not admitting fault.

Company executives and attorneys said as recently as last month that every case would be fought individually.

Analyst Steve Brozak of WBB Securities called Merck's' handling of the litigation "a Harvard casebook study of how to deal with a problematic product."

Investors seemed to agree, as Merck shares jumped more than 2 percent, or $1.23, to $56 at the open of trading Friday.

Analysts predicted early on that liability could reach $50 billion, but after losing its first case in a $253 million verdict, Merck has won a string of civil cases.

Merck may now have put the uncertainty of millions of dollars in legal costs behind it, though it has been fairly successful fighting cases individually, winning 10 of 15 court verdicts to date.

The company said last month it had added $70 million to its reserves for defending lawsuits. As of Sept. 30, Merck had reserved a total of $1.92 billion for legal expenses and spent a total of $1.2 billion.

The deal becomes binding only if 85 percent of the plaintiffs in about 26,600 lawsuits agree to drop their cases. It was finalized in the early morning hours after attorneys for Merck and the plaintiffs met with three of the four judges overseeing nearly all Vioxx claims.

Seeger said the deal was put in motion last December when three key judges pushed the parties to open out-of-court talks.

"Every claimant is going to be compensated" once their claim is validated, he said.

Seeger believes it is the largest settlement ever in the industry and said he will recommend that his 2,000 clients accept the deal.

Payments would vary, depending on severity of injuries and the length of time that Vioxx was used.

"The agreement is structured to provide a significant degree of certainty toward resolving the majority of the outstanding VIOXX product liability claims in the United States for a fixed amount," Richard T. Clark, chairman, president and chief executive officer of Merck, said in a statement.

Attorneys for both sides were to present the deal Friday morning to U.S. District Judge Eldon E. Fallon in New Orleans.

Avoid a DUI Conviction

5 Tips to Help Avoid a DUI Conviction


If you are ever arrested for drunk driving (also called DUI for "driving under the influence" or DWI for "driving while intoxicated"), your experience will begin with an officer stopping you because of some questionable driving pattern, or possibly because you encountered a DUI "sobriety checkpoint" or you were involved in an accident. The officer will approach your car and ask some questions. You will then be asked to perform "field sobriety tests". He may also ask you to breath into a handheld device, technically called a PBT or "preliminary breath test". You will then be arrested. On the way to the police station, you will be asked to submit to a breath or blood test -- and told that if you don't, your driver's license will be suspended.

What should you do and say during all of this to minimize the risk of a criminal conviction and a license suspension?

1. Politely decline to answer any questions without an attorney present. It is a cardinal rule in legal circles that only incriminating statements are included in police reports and later testified to in court; statements pointing to innocence are invariably ignored, forgotten or misinterpreted. Bluntly put, whatever you say will almost never help you and can only hurt you.

2. Decline to take any so-called field sobriety tests. These are theoretically intended to determine impairment, but in fact are designed for failure. In most cases, the officer has already made the decision to arrest and is simply going through the motions and gathering further evidence to bolster his case (he is the one who decides whether you "pass" or "fail"). In almost all states, you are not required to submit to this "testing". It's unlikely that taking it will change the officer's decision to arrest.

3. Decline to take a "PBT" (preliminary breath test). These handheld units are carried by officers in the field to help decide whether to arrest or not and are notoriously inaccurate. In most states, drivers are not required to submit to these tests (in some they are required if you are under 21). Although most states admit the results of these tests into evidence only to show the presence of alcohol, some permit them to prove the actual blood-alcohol level.

4. Do you choose blood, breath -- or refuse to take any chemical test? This is a case-by-case decision, and involves a number of considerations. First, although blood tests are subject to many possible errors, they are generally more accurate than so-called "breathalyzers"; if you feel your blood-alcohol level is below .08%, then you might want to choose the blood test. Secondly, whether to submit to testing at all requires some knowledge of your state's laws -- specifically, the consequences of refusing. If the increased criminal penalty and license suspension do not outweigh the possible benefit of depriving the prosecution of blood-alcohol evidence, then you may wish to refuse. Bear in mind that the prosecution will charge you with two offenses, DUI and driving with over .08% blood-alcohol; without a blood or breath test, he cannot prove the .08% charge, and there will be no chemical evidence to corroborate the officer's testimony. You should also realize that in many states chemical evidence of a very high blood-alcohol level, say over .15%, can trigger more severe penalties.

5. In almost all states, your driver's license will be immediately suspended if either (1) the chemical tests results are .08% or higher, or (2) you refuse to submit to testing. You have a right to a hearing to contest this administrative suspension, and there are many possible defenses, many of them technical in nature. This hearing is usually separate from the criminal proceedings, and involve different procedures and issues than in court; it is not uncommon to lose the criminal case but win the suspension hearing. However, as most motor vehicle departments do not really want the time and expense of providing these hearings, they tend to provide notice of the right buried in fine print given to arrestees. The critical information is the requirement that an actual demand for the hearing must be made by the arrestee -- usually within ten calendar days. If you do not contact the DMV within ten days, you lose all rights to a hearing -- no matter how good a defense you may have. Tip #5: Get an attorney right away, or make the call yourself -- and make sure you can later prove you made the call within the ten day window!